The Flipped LMS

Hooboy, do people like to complain about their LMS (Learning Management System). As evidenced by this conversation on #chat2lrn that I was a part of, L&D folk would like to wish away this beast of a software program. The thing is though, that no one ever really does get rid of their LMS. Why is that?

I believe that the root cause of this contradiction lies in two conflicting drivers: 1) It is important to the business to track training. 2) The way we track training now gets in the way of learning. Many people including myself have argued the first point so I’ll focus now on the second point. In the current process of using an LMS, in order to track training, you must control access to content. But we live in the Internet age now and we all know that content wants to be free. If we cannot resolve this disconnect, there is no hope for improving our relationship with our learning architecture.

The Flipped Classroom is a concept that breathed life into the disconnects of the education world. Perhaps the idea of a Flipped LMS can bring us to a solution. In the Flipped Classroom, instruction and experimentation (homework) were separated and switched, where the instruction was provided by video at home and the teacher supported the experimentation in the classroom. Imagine if we separated the content from the assessment. Put the assessment in the LMS where it can track whether someone learned, and let the content exist outside the LMS where it is always accessible for anyone. The assessment can have a landing page (most assessment tools can do this) that provides context for the information being assessed: why it’s important, how it is assessed, where to learn what you need to improve your score. Here would be the link to the content. There could be three assessments per program, all orchestrated by the LMS: A pre-test; the post-assesment and a follow-up assessment to reinforce the learning.

This way you are using the LMS for what it does best. By allowing multiple attempts and multiple sources of learning, you are letting the learner be more flexible and you are tracking improvement over time with less complexity.

But how do we know who accessed the content? This is the beauty of the idea. By splitting up access and assessment you also split up what you have to measure. For assessment, you must track individuals and so you need the LMS, but to track the reach of your content, you only need numbers of users and visits, not individuals. This can be done by any web analytics tool like Google Analytics.

Hopefully the clarity produced by this split in efforts will help L&D folk move on to more important conversations than how much they hate their LMS. That is, until they get the next bill from the LMS vendor.
Advertisements

4 thoughts on “The Flipped LMS

  1. Hey Adam! Agree completely. Wrote about LMS and fighting the tendency we have to tightly bundle content in these posts:

    http://androidgogy.com/2013/09/04/rewriting-the-lms-story-part-1/
    http://androidgogy.com/2012/05/04/design-formations-30/

    We built a few different models when I was working for the USCG. One of them we called the companion. This placed all of the content in an easily accessed and searched performance support tool. The companion piece on the LMS was a set of challenge scenarios that was easily completed using the support tool. This worked out great and met a major objective of getting folks to understand the value of the available support tools. A similar model was applied for many tasks.

    This makes a lot of sense from a design economics standpoint.

    • Hi Steve,

      Thanks for the comment and for sharing the links. I love your battle cry “Make Fewer Courses!” We have 5000 courses in our LMS which I think is 4800 too many. It sounds like you did exactly what I was talking about in this post. Sounds cool. It’s funny that the LEarning Technologists are the one’s calling for a lighter touch on the use of Learning Technology.

      regards,

      Adam

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s